THE COLLEGE MUSIC CRITIC
Many of my most positive opinions about music were formed while I was an undergraduate at Carleton. (as opposed to many of my, um, less positive opinions (now well known to my three readers) which I developed while in graduate school a few years later.) Here's a picture of me on my first day as a Junior at Carleton. 1
To honor the positive accomplishments Carleton made towards educating me I send them token donations every year. In exchange they send me wall calendars so saturated with nostalgia that I instantly toss them out.
These days Carleton also emails alumni newsletters replete with something called "E-NEWS". Recently E-news announced that every issue of the school newspaper, The Carletonian, had been digitized and posted online at ArcaSearch.
I immediately did the most natural thing, I searched the archive for my own name.
It turns out that during my senior year I wrote a number of concert reviews and promotional pieces. I had completely forgotten all of them except one.
For example, I have absolutely no memory of the concert I was flogging in this article Band Concert on Pastoral Lilac Hill on May 17, 1973. Here's a picture of the Carleton Band (obviously not on Lilac Hill, but you can see me playing clarinet to the left of the conductor, framed by the wye of the tree.)
The one article which hadn't escaped my memory was a review of the William O. Smith/John Eaton Lucas Lectures. Eaton and Smith - It Sounded Better From the Lobby on January 18, 1973. It was very positive article in spite of the subtitle. I also wrote a promo for those concerts: Eaton, Smith, New Music on January 11.
I'm sure that event has stayed in my memory because meeting clarinetist William O. Smith really did change my life. I spent the next couple of decades trying to be an avant-garde clarinetist. I never saw Smith again - but I did continue to explore the boundaries of clarinet performance and even played his solo clarinet music from time to time (for example, check out the program at the end of this post). He deserves a long overdue thank you.
Here are three more reviews.
Contemporary '73 (music by Bartok and Crumb, February 15, 1973)
It's Too Bad They Wore Tuxedos (The American Woodwind Quintet - Nov. 11, 1972)
I Adore Philador (March 8, 1973)
Reading these brought back a flood of useless memories.
DOMENICO SCARLATTI KEYBOARD SONATAS 2
In the review of the Philador Trio (playing 18th century Italian baroque music) I was clearly out of my element. But this paragraph stood out from the antique typesetting:
In my biased opinion, the 490 odd Demenico (sic) Scarlatti harpsichord sonatas are the most enjoyable pieces ever written (and I will defend myself against all who disagree, but I will never deny that I am right). It is not odd, therefore, that I thought that the performance of five of these sonatas was the high point of the concert. No more discussion is necessary.
Two realizations made reading this bit of boyhood music criticism fascinating:
- My enthusiasm for Scarlatti's keyboard sonatas has remained the same (or maybe even increased) over 35 years. 3
- My propensity to make grand sweeping generalizations of what constitutes good (or bad) music has remained the same (or maybe even increased) over all these years as well.
When I got to CalArts Valenti, who was on the faculty, gave an all-Scarlatti concert. He worked hard to bring the emotions of the pieces out - way out, nearly collapsing in "tears" onto the keyboard of his harpsichord at the end of one poignant sonata. Ever since then that performance has defined the phrase "milking it" in my mind.
Years later the first complete set of Scarlatti sonatas by Scott Ross became available on 33 compact discs.
I found out about the set when the local Pacifica station KPFK devoted all their daylight airtime during a holiday weekend to broadcasting the whole thing. I listened intently. The presenter was William Malloch (here or here or here for bits of info) who rationalized the broadcast to the audience (and perhaps to the station management) as a tribute to Ross, an early victim of Aids, rather than as an opportunity to experience some great music. Whatever. It worked.
The form and style of each sonata is remarkably consistent throughout the cycle. A modern composer could never imagine writing so many similar pieces. The closest modern equivalent, if you ignored the issue of lyrics, might be a prolific popular songwriter.
Listening to the entire Scarlatti set made me realize that the 555 sonatas form one huge piece of music, a single hours-long work. The sonatas are so similar that each becomes just a moment in a huge meta-structure, not "movements" (as in a symphony) but more like "choruses" (as in a jazz solo.)
Multiple Scarlatti sonatas become a bubbling stream of constantly fresh ideas in which twists of melody, harmony and rhythm are always floating past. The underlying sonata structure provides some cohesion. The overall effect reminds me of John Coltrane soloing on, say, My Favorite Things - putting out idea after idea while the rhythm section vamps happily in the background.
If you consider the massive length of the combined Scarlatti sonatas they can be compared to another keyboard piece, Vexations by Erik Satie. Vexations is a short gnarly dissonant bit of piano music which the composer instructed was to be repeated 840 times during a single performance.5 Of course the actual musical content couldn't be more different. Scarlatti is tasty and rich - a true physical pleasure. Satie is just a few seeds and stems, memories from the bottom of the bag.
I also own a complete recording of all the Haydn symphonies conducted by Antal Dorati. This represents about the same quantity of music (and same number of discs) as the Scarlatti. The difference is, as you progress from symphony to symphony chronologically, you can hear Haydn working out his ideas, changing over time. He created the form by trial and error, adopting and discarding things. This is completely different than the way I perceive the Scarlatti. I'm not suggesting a value judgment between these two massive bodies of music. Rather I'm making an observation about the purposes, personalities and careers of the two composers as viewed abstractly through the artificial lens of nearly three dozen compact discs each.
Finally, I've noticed that my interest in Scarlatti does not change according to the medium or performer to which I listen. My iPod currently has four different interpreters - Ross, Valenti, Horowitz and Carlos - on harpsichord, harpsichord, piano and Moog. I enjoy all of them.
My affinity for Scarlatti is directly to the music itself. There is some ineffable, magical quality of his writing which resonates naturally with me and my tastes andmy preferences. It's a wonderful thing - which I can't really explain - and which I don't really understand.
NOTES AND LINKS
1 Note the chair I'm sitting in. Here's the same guy (me) sitting in the same chair 20 years earlier:
This was my Grandmother's chair. I wonder if it is still at Carleton, passed down from graduates to undergraduates year after year since 1973 - and hopefully cleaned or reupholstered on occasion.
2 The Complete Scarlatti Sonatas performed by Scott Ross on Warner Classics here. The Wikipedia entry on Scarlatti indicates that two more complete sonata cycles are in production, one on harpsichord the other on piano.
The Scott Ross wikipedia link.
Pdfs and funky sound files of a bunch of sonatas available at the Werner Icking Music Archive.
Domenico's picture came from here where you can find Midi files of all the sonatas.
3 Here's another Mixed Meters article about a college-era favorite composer about whose music my opinion has since changed.
4 Listening to the Well-Tempered Synthesizer album for the first time after several decades was a real trip for me. At first I was shocked by the "antique" analog synthesized sounds. But after a short time my disbelief was suspended and I relived a perfectly wonderful experience. I also realized that my use of stereo effects in my current music probably ultimately derives from their use in the Switched On albums.
5 Personally I think Satie was joking when he wrote the instruction to repeat so many times. The piece is no more scrutable after the last repetition than it is after the first. Someday I should write about my experiences playing in two complete performances of Vexations. One of them was organized by composer Carl Stone and broadcast live over KPFK. Once upon a time KPFK was quite a wonderful place to experience interesting music. Once Upon A Time....
Domenico Tags: Domenico Scarlatti. . . Carleton College. . . music criticism. . . Scott Ross. . . Fernando Valenti. . . Wendy Carlos. . . Well Tempered Synthesizer. . . John Coltrane. . . Erik Satie. . . Haydn. . . William O Smith. . . William Malloch. . . Scarlatti. . . David Ocker
No comments :
Post a Comment